Skip to content

Opinion 142

Question Presented

Is it a violation of the Canons of Ethics for an attorney to office with a company whose only business is the making of bail bonds, and whose office has a large neon sign reading "Bail Bonds" and several other signs on the windows and across the front of the building, one of the signs being three feet high, and read­ing "Bail Bonds, Day or Night," and the attorney having his name and At­torney at Law in small letters on the window under the bail bonds sign, and said attorney being employed by the bail bondsmen to obtain Writs of Habeas Corpus, usually without the attorney seeing the client, and the attorney being paid a portion of the money received by the bondsmen for making the bail bond, and in most cases when the case is set by the Court the bondsmen notify the client that his case is set and up to that time the client has paid the attorney no fee whatsoever?

18 Baylor L. Rev. 254 (1966)

SOLICITATION - SIGNS - JOINT OCCUPANTS

An attorney who occupies an office with a bail bond company, may not have his professional sign, even in small letters, beneath the companies prominent sign advertising that it deals in bail bonds.

STIRRING UP LITIGATION
It is improper for an attorney to be employed by a bail bond company to obtain Writs of Habeas Corpus for the company's customers, usually without the attorney seeing the customer.

DIVISION OF FEES - ATTORNEY AND BONDSMEN
It is improper for an attorney, who is employed by a bail bond company, to obtain Writs of Habeas Corpus for its bond customers when in the usual course the attorney does not see the client until that time the client has paid the attorney no fees whatsoever.

Canons 24, 25, 31, 32, 43. A.B.A. Canons 27, 35.

Bluebook Citation

Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 142 (1957)