May a law firm accept employment in a lawsuit where one of the partners could be a witness?
DR5-101(B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides as follows:
A lawyer shall not accept employment in contemplated or pending litigation if he knows or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness, except that he may undertake the employment and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify:
DR5-102 of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides as follows:
A. If, after undertaking employment in contemplated or pending litigation, a lawyer learns or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness on behalf of his client, he shall withdraw from the conduct of the trial and his firm, if any, shall not continue representation in the trial, except that he may continue the representation and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify in the circumstances enumerated in DR5-101 (B)(1) through (4).
B. If, after undertaking employment in contemplated or pending litigation, a lawyer learns or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm may be called as a witness other than on behalf of his client, he may continue the representation until it is apparent that his testimony is or may be prejudicial to his client. (Underlining ours)
We believe the above mentioned Disciplinary Rules clearly set out the circumstances in which a lawyer may accept employment or continue his employment when he ought to be a witness or when he learns that he may be a witness.
Attorney should not accept employment in contemplated or pending litigation if he knows or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as witness except under certain circumstances.
Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 363 (1973)