Skip to content

Opinion 363

Question Presented

May a law firm accept employment in a lawsuit where one of the partners could be a witness?

DR5-101(B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides as follows:

A lawyer shall not accept employment in contemplated or pending litigation if he knows or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness, except that he may undertake the employment and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify:

  1. If the testimony will relate solely to an uncontested matter.
  2. If the testimony will relate solely to a matter of formality and there is no reason to believe that substantial evidence will be offered in opposition to the testimony.
  3. If the testimony will relate solely to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case by the lawyer or his firm to the client.
  4. As to any matter, if refusal would work a substantial hardship on the client because of the distinctive value of the lawyer or his firm as counsel in the particular case. (Underlining ours)

DR5-102 of the Code of Professional Responsibility provides as follows:

A. If, after undertaking employment in contemplated or pending litigation, a lawyer learns or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm ought to be called as a witness on behalf of his client, he shall withdraw from the conduct of the trial and his firm, if any, shall not continue representation in the trial, except that he may continue the representation and he or a lawyer in his firm may testify in the circumstances enumerated in DR5-101 (B)(1) through (4).

B. If, after undertaking employment in contemplated or pending litigation, a lawyer learns or it is obvious that he or a lawyer in his firm may be called as a witness other than on behalf of his client, he may continue the representation until it is apparent that his testimony is or may be prejudicial to his client. (Underlining ours)

Bluebook Citation

Tex. Comm. On Professional Ethics, Op. 363 (1973)